Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Definition of Appeal Evidence Against Section 417 Prisoner Eviction Defendant and he did not really see that the evidence of some of the prosecution witnesses who were shot at the accused was inconsistent and the defendant Apart from the survivors, no evidence of independent witnesses has been brought forward to prove that the defendant actually fired. Prosecution prosecution witnesses who claimed they saw the accused firing did not come forward and dismissed the prosecution's witnesses, who were relatives of the victim, dismissed where they heard gunfire. There are Sunnis, as well as they said this. It has been stated that the nesses he saw firing at the death toll of the prosecution prosecution was not a decisive factor, but it was the quality and valuable evidence given by the witnesses that took place twenty (20) days after the incident. The recovered arms and ammunition were recovered, not sealed on the occasion as required by law, and presented to the court in a broken condition, tampering or alteration of weapons, It could not be ruled out that the weapons were not sent to the forensic science laboratory and the ballistic expert's report was not submitted. The idea, therefore, was that such a report was never. Despite the recovery of the weapons, ammunition and emptiness recovered, the most important evidence, namely the ballistic expert, was not reported, which had to go to the accused, which required no interference in the verdict, and so on. Accordingly, the appeal against was dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
