TAJ MUHAMMAD BROHI versus MST. FARIDA AHMAD MUHAMMAD AHMED SIDDIQUI
A. XLVII R 1 and Section 115 Revision Amendment Scope The applicant requested a review of the appellate court order under which the trial court's decision under Order XLVII, Rule 1, CPC, was dismissed. The applicant's position was that the unwanted decision was against the law and fact. In the present case no application for jurisdiction, illegal presumption, unreasonable or irregular exercise error has been found; no revision can be requested against the abolition of law and fact which in no way has the jurisdiction of the court Is not affected, however false or inaccurate, this decision may be on a question of fact or law on which the revision jurisdiction has not been given any concrete right as the right to move a revision request is merely an invalid jurisdiction. Based on the assumption that the review was excluded under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
