NAVEED versus COMMISSIONER WORKMEN COMPENSATION EAST KARACHI
Applicants dispute the applicant's review of Section 23 Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 18 Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), proposal and section 114 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 approved by the Compensation Commissioner of Constitutional Applicants. ? The Workers' Compensation Commissioner did not have the authority to review his own order. The purpose of the accuracy for which the CPC was applied to the provisions of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and the Workman's Compensation Act, 1923 was limited to taking evidence only. Enforcing the attendance of witnesses and the compulsory production of documents before the relevant authority was not a matter of procedure, but a question of jurisdiction and a matter for jurisdiction. Do not use unless expressly honored by a tribunal under this Act under which he is using the High Power URT rejects the commissioner's workman's compensation order under which They put their order aside Constitutional application was allowed, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
