Article 2 302 (b) and Q 34 Qatim Amal, the definition of evidence has the material contradictions contained in the statements of the complainant and other prosecutor's witnesses, which, according to the FIR, does not specifically constitute any of the accused. Was not attributed Subsequently, the prosecution's witnesses improved their testimony, saying that the accused was hurt, no criminal weapons were recovered from the possession of the accused, presented by the prosecution witness during the examination of Wardt's place. The property, which had no legal status, the complainant stated that all the accused came and fired at the complaining party and in retaliation, the complaining party also returned fire in their defense, but the prosecution's witness did not support it. That the testimony of the injured prosecution witnesses could not be recorded, even though they were summoned. And the processor server stated that the PR was aware that the witnesses of the non-tension were not aware that the parties were on extraordinary terms with each other; Was isolated and the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt, and he was acquitted. Accused and presented freely, the accused facing the same case, did not file an appeal to challenge his conviction because the same set of prosecution witnesses with the same evidence The victim was examined and the name of the co-accused was not presented to the FIR, and he was arrested from the hospital where he was admitted to the hospital, when the charges against him were generally received.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
