Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAZUL versus THE PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, KARACHI

Section 22A, 22B and 154 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Alternative Remedies FIR, The applicant's legal complaint was that he referred to the duty officer of the concerned police station for filing an FIR but his No action was taken on the complaint of. No petition / complaint has been filed with Justice of Peace against not registering his complaint / applicant failed to avail of alternative treatment, which was not only an effective and appropriate remedy but under the law he had the sole right. There was a cure for recovery of theft. In the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, the cattle and articles were unable to be maintained and the applicant could approach the Justice of Peace regarding his complaint. Can begin proceedings in accordance with law and the application was dismissed in the articles Y

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• NAVEED v. COMMISSIONER WORKMEN COMPENSATION EAST KARACHI 2013 PLC 162
• Mst. SHABANA YASMEEN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Member Board of (Revenue), Karachi 2013 CLC 164
• GHAZI v. State 2013 YLR 164
• ARY COMMUNICATION (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Information and Broadcasting, Islamabad 2013 PLD 168
• Syed SAEED HAIDER v. PRESIDING OFFICERS, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V and 21 2013 PLC 170
• HUSSAIN BUX v. State 2013 MLD 170
• KHALIDA AKRAM v. State 2013 MLD 176
• ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi 2013 CLC 178

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

when you need a advocate from Doaaba lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes