MUHAMMAD KHALIQULLAH SIDDIQUI versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Article 55 and [55 [as amended and amended by the Industrial Relations (Rehabilitation and Amendment) Act (XV of 2010)] Pakistan WAPDA Act to Leave Laws, 1982, R27 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for Applicants Will be employed because of a job In the long absence of 9 years, the applicant, who has been absent from duty for nine years, claimed that during this period he was ill, the petitioner gave his justification for his illness. Failure to submit a medical certificate to justify it, the absence of the applicant for nine years was unwarranted and the WAPDA exemption rules were amended in 1982. Under the Knowledge Order 27, an employee will cease to be an employee for absence of more than five years. Syed Roll closed the applicant's post claiming to be rehabilitated after being absent for a period. To be done Nine years, without any strong or convincing reason, complaints filed by the applicant were properly dismissed by the Labor Court applicant. In order to present a case for restitution, the defective orders of the courts below, cannot be interfered with, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
