Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD WASEEM versus MEHMOOD AHMED


The appeal against the order of dismissal under A. XLIII, R 3 and O IX, R 13 and IX, the non-service of notice to respondents for issuing a pre-parte decree to R 13 was that from filing an appeal. The services of the first respondent were compulsory. Order XLIII, R 3, CPC validation requirement will apply only if the case is still pending but not in the case when the case has already been decided and if the defendant has filed the petition. If present to defend a claim against the payer, such offer would be equivalent to a waiver of notice, in the present case, which was not pending at the time the appeal was filed. Respondent was also present, which, in the circumstances, is equivalent to waiving notice even if it is necessary to issue. The appeal was viable

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Chashma lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.