Find a Lawyer

MESSRS UNITED BRANDS LIMITED versus BRAND MASTERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED

Section 305 Appeal to Bid Company by Court Defaults on Debt Payment by Company Company Failure to Accept Debt Payment Agreement Agreement Acting Company (Lender) Applicant Company for Payment (Lenders) agreed to discharge its entire obligation in accordance with the terms of the Debt and Settlement Response Company. Within a period of 12 months it was agreed to repay the loan in 12 equal installments, and the court agreed to submit every installment to the respondent company's breach of contract, but repeatedly asked the respondents in all the ways. Notices were issued through, which includes publication in newspapers. All of the respondent company's actions showed that they were unable to pay their debts, request for collateral was granted, the government official was required to take care of the plaintiff's affairs and proceed more strictly in accordance with the law. The leviator was fixed.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ABDUL LATIF v. Mst. HAKIM ZADI 2013 PCrLJ 813
• ZULFIQAR SHAKOOR v. QUETTA TOWN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. 2013 MLD 815
• MUHAMMAD WASEEM v. MEHMOOD AHMED 2013 CLC 816
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. SANA TRAVELS (PVT.) LTD. 2013 YLR 817
• Syed ALTAF HUSSAIN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2013 CLC 824
• Mst. ZAREEDAH BEGUM v. ABDUL RASHEED 2013 YLR 831
• MEHAR alias DHANI BUX v. State 2013 MLD 831
• MANZOOR ALI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 832

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

how to become a advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes