Find a Lawyer

DANIYAL M. ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD WASAM KHAN

Articles 9439 and 616 were granted by the trial court for review of the Petitioner's scope application, and the case property was ordered to be handed over, but the order was later revoked on the petition filed by the respondent. And the petitioner's application was invalidated The trial court did not have the power to review its powers under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, and all orders relating to the disposal of the property were final except that on the preceding injunction. The request for review is allowed, before the trial court's order was revived. When it was approved with respect to the latter order. There was a violation of the law on the same property

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• KALI KHAN v. BODLO 2013 CLC 507
• AMMAR FAROOQ v. State 2013 PLD 508
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI v. E.N.I. PAKISTAN (M) LTD., KARACHI 2013 PTD 508
• ABDUL GHAFOOR alias MULTANI v. State 2013 MLD 509
• AL-BARAKA BANK (PAKISTAN) LIMITED v. Raja ASHFAQ HUSSAIN 2013 CLD 511
• Captain Syed WARASAT HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD AHAD SAAD 2013 PLD 513
• SHABIR TILES AND CERAMICS LIMITED v. CACHE SYSTEMS PAKISTAN 2013 CLC 518
• RIZWAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry 2013 YLR 520

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

patent advocate from Bisham lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes