NORTHERN POLYTHENE LTD. (NPL) versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Sections 7 (2), 22 and 27 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O IX, R 9 and O XVII, R 17 Application for the reopening of a case for illegal prosecution, jurisdiction of the Banking Court scope banking court, In the absence of the procedure adopted, the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001 will not be required to comply with the order of filing an exemption for illegal prosecution under the CPC and neither of the parties. The right qualities were decided and no decision, decision or decision was responsible. Such an order to be challenged in the appeal cannot be considered in any decision under OXVII, R3, the CPC issued to the Banking Court under section 27 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001 Restoration of the case was not banned, for which it was dismissed. Without touching on the merits of the banking court case before the trial, the prosecutor would not want to see if sufficient cause of the previous proceedings was shown and whether such application was barred? If so, then everyone's delay is explained or not the rules
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
