Sections 302, 324 and 353 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 342 Conviction to prevent a public servant from discharging his duties The authority to inspect a defendant Defendant to examine the defendant Defendant Failure to inspect his conviction against the defendant proved unsuccessful, the result of the trial of the accused was remanded because he used criminal force on the police party, preventing him from being arrested and A private person was killed in the gunfire. The suspect was later arrested in connection with the injuries sustained by the fireworks injury in which he himself sustained a firearm and was also allegedly found with a live ammunition. The trial court had sentenced the accused under sections 302, 324 and 353, the conviction of the accused was that in the meaning of the trial court section 342, in questioning the recovery of arms from his injuries and his seizure. The CRPC failed, so the unwanted decision was not lasting. The competent trial court should have questioned the accused with regard to each and every kind of evidence available on record, so it would have to be interpreted in terms of the provisions of section 342, CRPC. Have to comply. The terms, justice was inevitable, the trial court must get the remand. The trial was referred to the trial court, and the trial was presented to the trial court after the decision, under which the accused should be examined under section 342, CRPC. Especially of all the pernicious evidence on record
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
