Article 199 Constitutional application used by the amnesty plot Municipal Administration as a plate ground assigned to the defendant (private person) on the basis of the certificate obtained by the respondents shows the construction of the commercial plaza on the plot. That the five occupation certificates were issued to the defendants by the Administrator Town Committee, the Nazim Union Council and the Mukhtarikar at different times by any body to pay any consideration for any sale of such plot or to pay any modification fee. There was nothing available on record, the government did state land at the relevant time This allotment was banned, so the Administrator, Nazim and Mukhyarkar, although not authorized to issue such certificates during the ban period, had to give the Administrator a plot plot for a public purpose for another private purpose. Was not authorized to use, this case is malicious by administrator. Thus, the High Court and the Mukhtarikar, thus, the High Court can cure such illicit y and protect the general public from the hassle of such officers who had no respect for the law. On the one hand, the respondent claims that He has no interest in such a plot, while on the other hand he has got a registered sale deadline in this regard. The constitutional petition had no legal role in such a certificate; allotment of welfare schemes for any purpose other than convenience would violate the law and negate the rights of all citizens, who enjoy and benefit from the facility. It is the right of the High Court to issue such certificate and subsequent proceedings
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
