Article 497 (2) and 103 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 382/34 Evidence of the Law (10 of 1984), Article 38 After preparation for the cause of theft death, a joint intention, bail, further investigation grant The accused and co-accused allegedly stopped a trailer, robbed its drivers and conductors and took the trailer with them. The complainant did not report the delay of five days in filing the FIR, the distance between the incident and the police station was only 5. After 6km when the suspect was not presented to the magistrate for the identity parade after his arrest, then additional prosecution of the accused was not admissible as evidence under Article 38 of Canaan testimony, the accused. There was no recovery from the exclusive ownership of the owner and neither was the owner. During the recovery of the lost property from the base (bus stand), no private person was advised, which is a violation of section 103, the accused DC CCPC Constitution Section 497 does not fall under the Prohibited Clause, CC accused are admitted on bail accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
