MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus IVTH ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, HYDERABAD
Section 7 (1), without investigating the incident of unlawful disposal of disputed property, was handed over by the trial court to the complainant by interim relief The complainant failed to disclose the evidence of any witness who The complainant (the defendant) was unlawfully deposed. The immovable property was referred to the complainant only by the trial court on the ground that it had, despite the application under Section 7 (1) of the Mandate and the aforesaid Act of 2005, the title documents Was. Determining facts of illegal detention, the trial court did not address the complainant's illegal settlement case in his order, no inquiry into the complaint by the station house officer regarding the illegal disposal of the complainant. Were done The trial court's unnecessary order of the documents relating to the title of the disputed property was set aside, the case was remanded to TT by the Royal Court to make a proper investigation into the complainant's "illegal settlement" and if If necessary to enforce the accused as a party in the proceedings, and then after passing the speech order in accordance with the law, the review request is dealt with accordingly. \ R \ n \ r. n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
