Sections 5, 465 and 7, 7 fraud, valuable security fraud, etc. Accused in his statement under the definition of evidence section 34342, the CCPC denied all allegations made by the prosecution, but the trial court did not sign the accused's statement, which was mandatory. ? Section 2342, CRPC records further revealed that the trial court made errors and omissions from the indictment to the accused's statement, which would take the accused's case into reasonable doubt. Even when there was little doubt that the accused trial court considered photostat copies of the disputed exchange order, the final pay certificate and other documents without complying with the final law, the complainant stated in the FIR Has previously admitted his guilt. He, but the allegations made by the trial court, as well as the statements made by the trial court, did not mention the facts related to admitting the accused's guilt to the complainant. And no question was raised by the trial court about the prosecution in which it failed to establish its case against the accused without any doubt, an unknown order was fixed, the accused was acquitted. And he was released, under conditions
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
