SYED SAEED HAIDER versus PRESIDING OFFICERS, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V AND 21
Sections 9, 15 and 24 for the determination of the Collective Bargaining Unit to reject the result of the election and to appoint a new polling officer for the election were held in the jurisdiction of the Registrar and the results in compliance with the Supreme Court election results order. Announcement Officers were elected to various positions of office, which resulted in the registrar of trade unions rejecting the holding that fresh polling was conducted to hold elections for union officials by the Industrial Relations Act, 2008. Under Section 9, the Registrar did not have the authority to hold. The order change trade union registrar may refuse to register such a change, but if the registrar remained silent, the mandate of the law would seem to have been to consider that change once the registrar had registered the change, He was not authorized to call or recall his order as was done in the present case when the Registrar had effected the change, the party agitated persons, section 9 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008 (section 9). 7) you can refer to the Labor Court and the Labor Court if it is concluded that by registering this change, If an illegal action is taken, the supervisor may order new elections. The Registrar is not authorized by the Registrar to withdraw the order passed by him, where the Registrar has registered his change first and He then withdrew his order, termed it a state of judicial chaos, and none of the provisions contained in it were given the power to review. Registrar on Industrial Relations Act, 2008
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
