Section 9 (c) Determination of value of evidence for drug possession, reduction of woman accused of old age for the first time in constant custody from the day of arrest (17 4 2002), whether such mitigating circumstances are suspected (appellant). Were entitled to a permanent injunction against. He was seized while sitting in the car, from which about 85kg of marijuana was recovered. On the alleged statement of the accused, another 5735kg of narcotics was recovered from her husband's house, the trial court said. C). ) Under the Narcotic Sub-Metals Act 1997, he was sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs 300,000, and his conviction for payment of a fine of up to three years imprisonment meant that he had a special role. was not. The commission of the crime and she was the victim of the situation. That she was guilty for the first time. He was 59 years old and was a cardiac patient suffering from hypertension. The alleged drug was recovered from her husband's home and no special possession was recovered, and it is unfortunate that she moderated her current husband only 10 months before the crime. (Co-accused) was married. The accused was an elderly woman who has been in constant custody since the day of her arrest (17 2002 - 2002) and was also the first offender in which the accused's privilege was revoked; her sentence was reduced to 10 years in prison. Was done ; The fine was reduced from Rs. 300,000 to Rs. 100,000 and further imprisonment was reduced from three years to one year for payment of such fine.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
