Sections 9 (b) and 21 Drugs (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001, R4 (2) admitting evidence of possession of drugs, entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant, search of non-production of daily journal entries. Delay in sending samples for arrest warrant arrest without suspicion Impact of not examining the evidence of the material prosecutor (police officer) allegedly raided the quarters and recovered arms and recovered 1000 grams of hashish. The second case was tried by separate courts to recover both the accused in connection with the recovery of arms. Was acquitted, however, and was convicted and convicted of alleged marijuana being exported under Section 9 (b) of the Drug Substances Act 1997. Do not submit a copy of the entry to the police station for raids on the accused's quarters. The complainant / policeman for the raid operation failed to obtain a search warrant before departing for the alleged raiding process with the police party. Prior information was, therefore, required to obtain a search warrant under section 21 of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997. With a delay of about 22 days, the chemical executor, for whom no reasonable explanation was given by the prosecution, also failed to investigate the policeman, who headed the raiding party and kept it until it was recovered. The weapons and marijuana recovered at the scene of the incident were made under the same advice, however, the accused was acquitted in connection with the recovery of the weapon but the case of marijuana was recovered.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
