Section 497 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 365A, 215 and 34 kidnapping for abduction or confiscation of property, valuation security, etc. Gift to assist in the recovery of stolen property, joint intention bail, accused and co-accused Denied abducted complainant's father (abductor) alleges that some of the accomplices have been acquitted by the trial court under section 265K, CRPC while the other accused has been granted bail. , The accused was fully involved in the FIR abduction. A prosecution witness also involved the accused in his statements under Section 161, CRPC records show that the kidnapper was released from the custody of the accused even though some of the co-accused were acquitted by the trial court. But the prosecution's testimony could not be extended to the accused without examining the witnesses' testimony even though the accused claimed that one of the accomplices had been granted bail but a copy of such bail was made with the present bail application. The rental order was not attached, therefore, the defendant could not claim the guarantee on a regular basis. , There was huge material on record to file a case against the accused, causing him to delay filing an FIR. There is no guarantee of bail, and even in the present case, such delay was explained, the defendant's request for bail was dismissed in the circumstances. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
