Sections 302 (c), 302 (6), 304 and 306 definition of conviction evidence (c), the PPC scope accused, were charged to the trial court under section 230 c (c), PPC. He was convicted and killed and sentenced to 25 years imprisonment as well as directed to pay Rs 275,762 to the legal heirs of the accused. The witnesses were consistent with each other in every aspect of the case, as was the prosecutor's witness, who found that the incident had no relation to the complainant or the accused party, as he was an independent and natural witness. The incident was natural that no credible motive or rivalry of the complaining party had been proved to falsely implicate the accused; this incident took place in a broad daylight, as there was no false identity. F. The defendant, known for every testimony of the prosecution, proved the ocular testimony with the help of medical evidence, the trial court convicted the accused on the basis of irrevocable and inadmissible evidence, but did so. Ignoring the fact that Section 302 (c), PPC applied only in those cases where the murder of the accused was not applicable, in the present case, the evidence was not lodged under Section 303030, PPC. , Nor was the case covered by section 6306, PPC, so the accused cannot be prosecuted under section 2302. c), the offenders convicted under PPC Section 2302 (c), in such circumstances the PPC was changed to Section 2302 (b), and the sentence of 25 years imprisonment changed to life imprisonment. Was made because the Tao Azir Dat amount was also increased accordingly, an appeal of Rs 300,000 was dropped. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
