SHEIKH SHAFI-UD-DIN QURESHI versus MUHAMMAD SAALIM SHAHEEDI
Section 30 & 30 and Sindh 34 Tenant Limitation Ordinance (XVII of 1979 ance 1979), Section 11 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 154 and 561 of Pakistan, Article 199 Irrigation works The landlord was charged with wrongfully diverting water, mistaking a common intention, terminating the facilities and services by the landlord. The dispute between the landlord and the tenant was turned into a criminal case. The landlord was charged. That the water, gas and electricity connection of its tenant complainant was entered in the FIR Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 11 provided a mechanism for dealing with a situation where the landlord had to close the facilities and services, especially the landlord, therefore, was charged under section 430, PPC. Could not be done Conduct of misconduct in relation to their property, even if a prosecution case is filed, no offense under section 4 can be proved to the tion430, PPC, therefore, the action under the said section is invalid. Will be used, the imposed FIR was crushed under circumstances and the pending proceedings were adjourned, accordingly a constitutional application was granted
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
