TILLOTTS PHARMA AG versus GETZ PHARMA (PRIVATE) LIMITED
Sections 67, 86 and 90 (2) of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), section 554 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AX Exxon, RR 1 and 2 suits, order restriction interim injunction, approval of unfair competition And trademark infringement The plaintiff sought an injunction against the plaintiff saying that it prohibited the use of a registered trademark masculine in the name of a fraudulent and matching request. The mark was without declaration or its order was not merely seeking injunction on the record to deny the defendant's claim Any material that year, after the last batch imported in 2009, the government refused to give the complainant a license to import products that are not available in Pakistan for the past two years. It has been sold in the market since mid-2010, and there is no record justifying why the plaintiff took action against the plaintiff after the delay. Most of the 18 months, especially when the claimant claimed that the defendant was his agent for the sale of his product in Pakistan, which was not imported after the expiry of his license in 2009, the claimant's It is alleged that the claimant infringes their trademark mark with their registered trademark. The suit could not be settled on the request for matching until the plaintiff was successful in improving the registration of trademarks in relation to its product and the plaintiff was not entitled to the injunction that the defendant as defendant. Tilt in favor of product product market product market product market product market product product product
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
