Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AHMED versus MUHAMMAD YOUNUS LAKHANI

A IX, R 6 and O XX, R 16 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 133 The Preliminary Preliminary Order Witness of Accounts Not Inspected The plaintiff was working on a 50% commission basis in her business with the plaintiff. He purchased the stock broker's business on the plaintiff's business through the purchase and sale of the shares and subsequently requested to recover the money held by the defendant, however he was absent and on behalf of The evidence of the party's prior evidence was processed, unless challenged in the cross examination, which would be deemed to be the ten presented by the plaintiff through the affidavit. Auyzat series with the controversial and disputed evidence the claimant can not be pulled too badly. Thereby, the plaintiff has been fully and substantially certified and there was nothing in the record as evidence to deny PK's claim. In the absence of any evidence, contrary to the evidence of the plaintiff, the plaintiff's evidence was overweight, there was sufficient evidence on record in all cases, to respond to the affidavits of these individuals, while proving the claim presented. No evidence for this was on record. The claimant's claim with regard to withholding cash by the plaintiff was unfounded and there was no evidence on his claim, therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to the injunction in favor of which the preliminary injunction was approved with approval. jobs for fresh advocates from Bhera lawyer