Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE

Definition of Section 9 evidence9 evidence failed to explain why the private witness who specifically engaged the accused in the crime of embezzlement, why he was acquitted or no hostile plea against him, It was not ready to make false statements, it was not confirmed because the accused could not produce any witnesses in his defense merely to plead that no one was required to be acquitted against his superior. The prosecution examined 8 witnesses. In support of his case, the accused himself admitted in his statement that 2 or 3 persons had lodged a complaint that their utility bills had not been deposited in the relevant department, sufficient to prove that the accused. Received money from the utility bills and was involved in the fraud as the duty of the accused was on utility bills. Counter record shows that the accused had agreed to it. Was enough. In his statement under Section 342, CRPC, the specific defense request not taken by the accused, the trial court rightly rejected the defense plea on the ground of not being affected by the trust and later thinking. The prosecution had proven its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt about the material details and the evidence of the prosecution was not permanent, serious, direct, rigorous, reliable, and controversial; The trial had properly appreciated the evidence on record. Recorded against the accused working on the material available on the record, illegal or illegal of any kind when you need a advocate from Jhudo lawyer