Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE

The eight-day delay in filing the FIR of Section 7 (a) (e) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), section 2 (b) and 12 evidence was deemed satisfactory even otherwise. There is also the risk of the victim's murder, the delay in the prosecution's case will not raise suspicion, as contradiction in the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses has been stated by the accused's lawyer that he was not material in nature and that the support of the defense witnesses The decision cannot be held on the basis that was not supported. Prosecutors identified interference in prosecution case, indicted interference in prosecution case, failed to prove hostility by accusing police or complaining party specially. But considering the fact that they were proven innocent so that the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses could not be corroded in cross-examination, the trial court properly appreciated the evidence on record and worked on the material available with it. The conviction was recorded against the accused. The trial court upheld the Justice System Ordinance, 2000, while the trial court's uncontested verdict did not confirm any illegal / irregularity, weakness or misinterpretation of evidence, the accused was convicted Was when you need a advocate from Babri Banda lawyer