FAIZAN-E-HARAM HAJJ SERVICE (PVT.) LTD versus MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS
Article 199 With the allotment of the constitutional petition Hajj Quota, the cancellation of the quotas and the licenses against the applicants was alleged that they had actually helped some pilgrims to perform Hajj on Pakistani documents and in this connection against them. An FIR was filed under the provisions. 3 (2) (a) (b), 5, 13 and 14 of the Foreign Act 1946 and section 420/468/471/109, PPC Petitioners, however, the trial court did not consider section 265 K, CR PC State Had done evil under. The council submitted that the prosecution of the applicants' case, including their success in the criminal case, and the quota allotment remained pending the final decision of the committee constituted in the criminal case. Will The quota will remain on the final decision of such committee. The High Court dealt with the directive that the committee should consider the applicants constituted. HK's allotment shall be quota as well as evidence of the allegations. Depending on what is available against them \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
