Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ HUSSAIN versus DR. NASIR KARIM

The section & & dispossession was directed against the review order passed by the trial court under which the direct complaint filed by the applicant under section 4 of the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005 was dismissed. The suit, filed in connection with the injunction against the veterans, was adjourned to civil. The court, in which the applicant prayed for a permanent injunction against the property from disposing of the dispute, respondents also filed a petition for the same property, canceling the petition and also for a permanent injunction. There is a dispute between two parties about the same property. In the complaint, the decision was pending before the competent courts in which the two parties were required to establish their claims through well-known evidence for their claims unless the parties' title was cleared by the civil court. Go, under which criminal proceedings continue. Illegal Settlement Act, 2 005 could not be started. The lower court passed the right, stating that the matter is all judicial before the civil court, cannot be prosecuted under the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005, any illegal and irregularities in the results of the court below. In the absence of, the exercise of jurisdiction over the review cannot be interfered with by the High Court. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Talhur lawyer