Find a Lawyer

FARMAN ALI versus TANDI BAKHT

Claims 203 and 265K Complaints dismissed Applicants' counsel advised that after taking into account the matter and making allegations, the presiding officer should file evidence to investigate the matter. That, under section 203, CCPC, without recording the statement of the prosecutor's witness, it was argued that the prosecutor's case for abortion was argued by the applicants in an alleged incident in 2002. There was no prejudice before petitioner Prima, who filed a direct complaint for, January 1998, appeared false and serious even if, according to the applicant's own statement, the defendant in the jirga admitted his guilt. And was fined by the jirga, no explanation was given by the applicant. I was sad that the defendant's admission of the applicant or by the FIA lodged a complaint R, was not placed in any medical record evidence of poisoning the applicant's lawyer. The state's lawyer said the trial court was justified in handling the case because there is no doubt that the defendants will have no chance of sentencing. The arguments presented by the State Counsel appealed the reasoning, but after being serious and making the allegations, the proper way was to record it, at least before the disposal of any application under Section 265K, CR PC. The statement of the main prosecutor's testimony, only four witnesses were mentioned in the list of witnesses filed with the complaint, the trial court was directed to add four list of supreme court advocates from Rangoo lawyer