RAJIB ALI versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 bail, the grant of further inquiry State Council did not object to the approval of the bail on the basis that the offense was prohibited under section 497. Was not attracted to. (1), the CRPC and the police party failed to engage the free man, although they were already well aware that the alleged retrieval was from the robbery and not from the exclusive possession of the accused who allegedly fled. Was caught on. The car inspection officer did not check with the owner of the car to determine if the fact that the request made by the accused during the investigation could be ascertained that the investigation was not conducted properly. I can't say that safely. That it was alleged that the offense of actually owning and carrying alcohol was not punishable, which could cover the prohibition contained in section 497 (1), together with the fact that the CRPC The complainant did not share any independent information to witness and confirm in advance, although the matter occurred during the day while further investigation was required against the accused, he was guaranteed in the circumstances. Was granted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Naseerabad lawyer