MUHAMMAD BACHAL ALIAS BACHAL CHANDIO versus STATE
After going through the record, Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 452 and 504/34, the grant of further inquiry State Council submitted that there was no recovery from the accused. The incident from his place and he also confirmed the delay in recording the statements of the prosecution witnesses under Section 161, Ali PB's request for PC Pail bail, the accused claimed that on the date of the incident. He was taken to a hospital where he was under treatment. The police recorded the statement regarding the doctor who confirmed that the accused was abducted on the day of Alibi's presence. There is a cure and, furthermore, delaying the filing of the FIR and recording the statements of the prosecution witnesses has led to reasonable suspicion of the suspect being involved in further investigation. The accused was released on bail in the absence of reasonable grounds to declare the accused a non-bailable offense.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer