Find a Lawyer

QAMAR CARRIAGE COMPANY versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of office of Section 92 and 96 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), withholding agent for collection of tax from the persons on account of the Assessment Notice under Section 92 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Was released on The agent who withheld the collection of arrears without referring to any assessment year withheld such tax and in return for the tax deduction in the financial year 2000 01 with no confirmation from the applicant / assessee complainant / reviewer. Refunded to the state exchequer but the taxation officer refused to issue a refund on the basis that the balance outstanding for the assessment year in 1981 82 failed to prove that the claim for arrears was for the complainant. The current association was against individuals, which was a continuation of the national identity card of the complainant's former associates. birth 1971 1971 as the year of birth, which means that when the complaint was made, he was 11 years old in 1982, the earliest for the assessment year 1981 was raised at that time the Association of Personnel National Tax Number Questions were raised against the complainant at this time because the complainant was not allotted in this case because the presence of a member of the department's Association of Persons of Action was not explained as the recovery was not affected for 15 years. The requests to allocate diagnostic records and national tax numbers raised the assumption that the complainant was not the same as those related to the assessment years from 1982 to 1985. The arrears are due, after more than 15 years, the complainant was taken into effect without notice and, without detecting, the complainant was present in the Association of Persons. best law firm from Garh Maharaja lawyer