Find a Lawyer

RAVI GAS COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Section 122 (5A) and 170 Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Refund Prevention initiates proceedings for modification of assessments on the basis that a review under normal procedure. Diagnosis was finalized under the treatment of a cure. As a manufacturer and tax deduction was adjusted at the import stage which resulted in the return of the claim, while the income was assessed under the Prestoptive Tax Regime. It claims that the reviews of the year 2000 01, 2001 02 and 2002 03 Was finalized on 11 2 2002, 6. As of 2003 and 28 6 2003, which could not be reopened under section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, the assessee was admitted in relation to the tax year 2003, under section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance. , 124 was the date of 2004, 2001 constituted a refund and could be amended within one year after the Commissioner issued the amended consolidation under section 122 (4) (b) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Is. ssment, but notice of further amendments to the assessment was issued on 3 5 2005 and the re-review was not completed until 30 6 2005, i.e. within the stipulated period and it no longer contested the SC in relation to the tax year 2004. Can the refund be fixed according to the order dated 15th 2005, which means that the notice for amendment of the assessment under section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was withdrawn / canceled and the Income Tax Ordinance The misconduct was justified in the proceedings initiated under Section 122 of 2001. The complainant submitted valid evidence for President Pakistan's decision in C-36 of 2003 That can not be prevented due to the anticipated tax refund Federal tax liabilities mhts immigration advocates from Jehanian lawyer