SIDDIQUI SONS DENIM MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 11 (4), the establishment of the Office of the Federal Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), the section 9 extends the tax limitation, the complainant extends the time limit after the expiration of 90 days. The showcase notice was issued on 9-10 2007 and since then the order was passed within 90 days (ie by 9 1 2008) in terms of subsection (4) of section 11 of the Sales Tax Act 1990, now No action can be taken under such showcase notice. The department requested that the law not restrict the collector's option to extend the extension even after the first 90 days have expired. That the time will be extended before the first 90 days expire because the time extension was proposed. Submitted to the collector on 22 2 2008, which he can complete on 23 2 2008 by action 23 5 2008, from which time after the facts of the case an order will be passed if the arguments of the department are accepted. Then it would be equivalent to giving the collector unlimited power to remedy the inherent jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, then making the 90-day period to pass the order set out in this law completely obsolete. Because the order of nine was issued on 9 10 2007, this order should have been approved by 9 1 2008, until the time before the collector actually expires 90 days. I was extended because the order had already expired and no extension was allowed by the collector before it expired. The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommends that the Federal Board of Revenue instruct the relevant collector to vacate the showcase notice on 9-10 2007 within 30 days of receipt. The law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
