Find a Lawyer

KHANCO INDUSTRIES versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 36 (3), 11 (4), Provo & 45b (2) were not levied or levied of tax or were erroneously remanded on the show cause notice issued on 30 6 2000 and the case. The decision was made on 2 8 2002 after the end. The actual duration of 45 days or even 90 days, as listed in Sections 11 (4) and 36 (3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, can never be obtained by extending the trial period / order period. Was affected by the limitation and was not legally durable in the appeal of the illegal and illegal order as he failed to pass the original order through the DC despite the complainant's request on this account and the complainant. Failure to provide justice The Financial Administration Federal Tax Ombudsman was established. It is recommended that the competent authority be instructed to reopen the defect order on the original date 2 8 2002 and order it under the provisions of Section 45A of the Sales Tax Act 1990 on appeal of 30 2006 2006 and the above order. Impact annually. Timing limits, as provided in the law, as well as proceedings pursuant to the Annual Order and the provisions of the law in appeal of the above-held injunctive order \ r \ n ask a advocate free from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer