ARSHAD SALEEM versus CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY THROUGH AIRPORT MANAGER, KARACHI
An application under section 12 (2) and OV, R 10A section 12 (2), CPC suits the case on the basis that the respondent obtained this deception by misrepresentation and fraud. I ask you to withdraw the decision and order. As allegedly the applicant's address was not mentioned incorrectly in the central case, nor did the applicant conceal any material fact against the applicant in pursuance of the decree so as to say that the order The petitioner did not make any false statement and fraud in pursuance of such decree nor did the applicant have any allegation of false claims and any particular instance of fraud that the Dred Holder ordered in the main suit. Settled in receiving the letter, it was properly served and he chose to be absent from the proceedings. , As such a holder cannot be held liable for any unlawful act. In pursuance of the Rule of Order under Section 12 (2), the CPC was dismissed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Daur lawyer