MUHAMMAD SARWAR SHAKIR versus CHIEF OF GENERAL STAFF, G.S. BRANCH, GHQ, RAWALPINDI
R4 (1) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), denial of approval of section 4 selection grade appeal, ability of applicant's request to consider his case for grant of selection grade BPS16, Was rejected on the basis of what was announced by the Public Promotion Committee. He said that the selection grade appellant had filed an appeal against him. The decision of the appellant was that he was senior to the people who had been given selection grade BPS 16 and in accordance with the rules of the department, they were selected. Was eligible for the grade, but was held to be invalid for any reason for R4 (1) of the Civil Servant (Appeals) Rules 1977, without regard to any provision, provided that he holds any office or There will be no appeal or review on matters related to the individual's fitness commitment. Appellant, who was promoted to a higher rank or grade, was denied selection because he was disqualified after the Public Promotion Committee considered his case, the appeal was not authorized on the charge. And the jurisdiction case that appellant believed he was neglected, was not correct as his case was properly based on his service record by the Departmental Promotion Committee consisting of senior and responsible officers of the department. Consideration for which the appellant had not alleged. Any financial or interest appeals against him are inadmissible and, on the grounds of his inability to have jurisdiction, he was rejected, under circumstances \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Nowshera Cantt lawyer