GHULAM MUSTAFA versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, LAHORE THROUGH SECRETARY
R (v) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition, in which the Highway Patrol was performing duty as a wireless operator with the police, relaxing the age limit, after obtaining the Section I Petitioner. In response to an advertisement to apply for a position appointment, the departmental authority appeared in the examination and was declared a successful authority, whereby his letter informed the applicant that his application was rejected. Has been rejected because she has been rejected for one year, 9 months and 23 days. In the case of a candidate already working, filed an application for his appointment as A Section I under R3 (V) of the Punjab Civil Servant Recruitment Rule 1976 At the time of doing this, the accuracy applicant was in service - A public servant, for the duration of his permanent service, for the upper age limit set under any service rules, the age for which he was a candidate. When the applicant applied for the aforesaid appointment, his permission was within the age limit when the administration applied without legal authority Was annulled. The applicant's request will be processed in accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Thatta lawyer