ALTAF HUSSAIN SAJID versus MUHAMMAD ARIF
A. XXXVII, on the basis of the R2 Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881), Section 4 Stamp Act (II of 1899), Section 2 (5) (b) and (20) Signatures of the witnesses on the Foreign Note (Pro Note). The document signed by the defendant (its maker) retaining the 4 sum suit was unconditional allegiance to the plaintiff or to pay some money to his order as documented in the section of the Stamp Act, 1899 All the conditions laid down by 2 (20) were met, such a document was read with Section 4 of the Communications Equipment Act 1881. There was no bond within the meaning of section 2 (5) (b) of the Stamp Act, 1899, that the nature of such a document by the witnesses could not change its nature nor would it lose its significance. As a means of communicating in the meaning of O XXXVII, CPC was to be maintained on the basis of the suit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Fateh Jang lawyer
