Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALTAF HUSSAIN SAJID versus MUHAMMAD ARIF


A. XXXVII, on the basis of the R2 Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881), Section 4 Stamp Act (II of 1899), Section 2 (5) (b) and (20) Signatures of the witnesses on the Foreign Note (Pro Note). The document signed by the defendant (its maker) retaining the 4 sum suit was unconditional allegiance to the plaintiff or to pay some money to his order as documented in the section of the Stamp Act, 1899 All the conditions laid down by 2 (20) were met, such a document was read with Section 4 of the Communications Equipment Act 1881. There was no bond within the meaning of section 2 (5) (b) of the Stamp Act, 1899, that the nature of such a document by the witnesses could not change its nature nor would it lose its significance. As a means of communicating in the meaning of O XXXVII, CPC was to be maintained on the basis of the suit.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Pasni lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.