Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 396 and 397 bail, further investigative grants were not designated in the FIR nor did the supplement provided by the complainant three days after the incident. Was also named in the statement. But after that he was named accused in the second supplementary statement recorded about two months later, in which the complainant did not play any effective role of the accused, no doubt, the suspect's name is undoubtedly, His statement was made under Section 161 Cr PCC under the testimony of the injured prosecution, but in this he was referred to under Section 164 Cr CCP, he had apologized to them, during some of the investigation. Neither was recovered, the investigating officer declared the accused innocent and was named in Column No. 2 police opinion, though he was not bound by the court, For the purpose of bail it can be weighed, if it was based on sound reasoning, the challan was presented in court, but the charge was not framed, the accused's case being sub-section 497 CCPC. (2), is guaranteed \ r \ n lawer from fb area from Fateh Jang lawyer