Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR MIAN versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition was promoted to the rank of DIG in the Publicity Petitioner Police Group, but the Central Selection Board recommended deleting the applicant's record at its meeting. The applicant who had all the service records was clean, was never fined and his seniority among his colleagues acknowledged that the applicant was simply dismissed. It was reported that the applicant's ACR had reported some average remarks and had no clear reputation. The accuracy of the officer is not to be dismissed as average reports, but it is stated that in the service record of the applicants, the average selection of the average report in regard to the availability of the reports falls in the category of good results. The applicant for not taking the credibility of a clean officer was not cited as an example b During the argument, the department representative, who can establish baseless observations without any material evidence and without any documentary evidence. Even the unholy officer cannot be considered a petitioner's supremacy, it was a "personal" matter. According to the provisions of the Prohibition of Progress, there is a huge penalty and this penalty is imposed on a civil servant on this procedure. Cannot be implemented without executing. The decision to dismiss the applicant for development in B section 20 was termed as the case without the legal authority of the Sector Selection Board best advocate from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer