Find a Lawyer

AIZAD SAYID versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 16, 17, 18 (2) and 25 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Ordinance of Office (XXV of 2000), Sections 2 (3) and 9 Estimates of Escape from Wealth Based on information provided by an informant But when allegations of concealment of assets by the complainant without an independent inquiry to confirm the fact, he failed to prove such allegations with which the complainant was charged. That he has promised property to obtain a loan, nor confirmed it with the Excise and Taxation Department or the Motor Vehicles Registration Authority. And relied on half-baked information on the stock exchange that verified the credibility of information provided by reporters without verification or confirmation, making the department's conduct arbitrary, perverse and lawless. Was declared a non-profit, thus the department was not established within the scope of misconduct. It is encouraged to justify an unreasonable order The Federal Tax Ombudsman on Law recommends the Commissioner to abort an unclean assessment by adopting section 25 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, and the law, rules and regulations After investigating the compliance with the regulations, if demanded, to determine if the complainant owns the immovable / immovable assets, which he did not submit for assessment. famous lower court advocate from Noor kot lawyer