Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD JAMAL versus ABDUL WAHID KHAN

Section 2 (s), 16, 32, 79, 192, 156 (1) and CL (89), (90) of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XV of 2000), Section 2 (3) of the Customs Authorities Complaints against Customs clearance agents fraudulently defrauding orders and payment orders through Customs House Guarantee Cell through collusion between National Bank of Pakistan officials. With the help of a bank officer, the removal of relevant records by customs authorities and the stealing of customs duty in connection with the approval of collector customs (evaluation) for discriminatory attitude, negligence and delay in approving the delivery of goods. ? Evidence of alleged discrimination against the complainant in the department's proceedings in the goods handling by the complainant was such offensive because it was a response to complaints made by the complainant to the higher authorities in Calcutta. ? The Central Board of Revenue's evidence, along with pursuing the case in the customs court, was also negligent and delayed in issuing the charge sheet and investigating the duty-related matters involved in matters related to inquiries against tax employees. Miscellaneous Goods Included in Defamation Process, Negligence and Delay Defects Under Section 2 (3) of the Establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, the 2000 Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the Customs Court and Member Customs In the pending case, the Member Customs, Central Board of Revenue has to ensure proper representation of the department. The Central Board of Revenue made sure that the charge sheet was issued immediately to all taxpayers held in the FI in violation of the provisions of the law. immigration advocate from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer