Find a Lawyer

DATA COTTON WASTE, FAISALABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 25 CBR Circular No. 3 (54) Establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), section 117, 118 and 119 of the STP / 99 Pact 69 2001 2001 Constitution of Martyrs (section 10 of 1984). 9 and 11 circulate the list of suspected units before the complainant's name in the list of suspected units for issuance of counterfeit / flying invoices, value additions and record eviction despite notices issued by the department involved. Was made and subsequently the complainant was also named. The complainant had not been given any notice of such unilateral action in such notice. The justification for the inclusion of the name of the complainant was not grounded in the fact that the procedure adopted by the department was in violation of the principles of natural justice. Not giving such notice was not appropriate, but rather by the complainant. / He should have taken advantage of this opportunity to prove allegations of flying receipts. No one could pen. On the basis of doubt, the Department could not present any evidence to prove its allegations before the Ombudsman, who made the action unreasonable, baseless, discriminatory, malicious use of force and excessively excessive administrative and illegal purposes. Therefore, the Financial Administration established the Federal Tax Ombudsman to provide revenue revenue. Issue appropriate notice to the complainant stating all facts, grounds and reasons for including his / her name in the suspect list and decide the case within a reasonable time after the opportunity for a hearing. \ R \ n power of attorney advocate Feroz Watan lawyer