Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Application on prescribed form prescribed by retailer of section 2 (7) (47) and 14 of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), Sections 2 (3), 9 and 11 as Complainant of rib The ticking box for the retailer for the given business activity column meant that the complainant's process was to tamper with the box in which the retailer was crossing. Was gone and the box with the meaning of \ Distributor \ was checked on the option play. Was taken on the basis of an industry-issued certificate showing the complainant as their authorized dealer. And that he applied for registration as a form distributor and not because this version was correct regarding tampering with the retailer \ s complainant's own form, First Fax. The change did not tolerate its signatures / initiations. The benefit of the doubt in this regard, therefore, is that the complainant has the authority, the physical, verification of the complainant to be their authorized dealer, based on the May register as a wholesaler, which includes a dealer, but does not have the \ distributor \ authority The discrimination proceedings were unjustified, disobedient, contrary to the law, without misrepresenting the complainant as a possession distributor, and the misconduct was filed by the Federal Tax Ombudsman to the CBR. Was to direct the relevant authority to cancel the complainant. Register as a distributor and Pakistan, top advocate family court from Samundri lawyer