A. XXXVII, RR 1 and 2 and Section 20, the suit for recovery of money under the provisions of ArtXXVII CPC was ruled that the civil court's territorial jurisdiction claimed that the defendant was allegedly The plaintiff was released to the plaintiff within the limits of District S, and the bank insulted her in the district S limits as well, while a lawsuit was filed in the district W limits. And, therefore, the District W had no jurisdiction to prosecute the civil court, provided that Article 20 of the Code, CPC, provided that it does not fall under Sections 15 to 19, is located in a locality court. Can be established in the jurisdiction of which was actually and voluntarily resident or acquired for business or personal purposes, and such defendant may be prosecuted with leave of the court. Or where the defendants, in the present case, had confessed, in the present case, with their confession, had disclosed their residence address in District W, and in view of such facts and legal status, the District Trial Court The defendants can be prosecuted within the limits of. The jurisdiction was rightly assumed that the appeal was dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
