Find a Lawyer

EISA KHAN versus STATE

Articles 2 (2 (b) /, 34, 2 302 (c) / & 34 and 4 324/3434) by definition of the evidence itself, the incident took place in front of the accused's house when the complaining party fled towards the accused's house. The defendants, who had access to medical evidence, also supported the fact that the complaining party was fired when they arrived very close to the accused when accused by the prosecution, which is not proven by any evidence. The request came as the matter came to a close. The forensic science laboratory report confirmed the prosecution of two suspects in the shooting while Mills Only one person was injured by fire while four were injured by the complainant, three of whom died due to multiple injuries, thus, the accused killed three people. (34), the PPC was consequently changed to section 302 (c) / 34, PPC on each count and reduced their sentence to twenty-five. The year was calculated ??Everyone on each count was sentenced to the crime and punishment section 324/34, PPC and the sentence and sentence however set aside. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Shamsabad lawyer