Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MURTAZA BHUTTO versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Article 11 and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Transfer Applicant submitted that it was posted by transfer to this post \ K respondent where the respondent was posted. He claimed that he submitted his report of joining and began to perform his duties at the place of the working petitioner. He alleged that the defendant was using political influence to position himself at the place where the applicant was legally transferred. Issued to the Authority by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, which has been directed to withdraw the transfer order of the applicant. Documents on the K record clearly proved that unwanted orders were approved and no indication was received by the Secretary, Sindh Local Government Board. That the private secretary of another minister or someone else has called for illegal orders or misused his authority to impress his superiors, even if such incidents were, in fact, a contentious fact. Can't inquire about The High Court in the proceedings of the constitutional petition; and the applicant must refer to the competent forum for this purpose as the petition filed by him in the constitutional petition was dismissed, and the applicant shall be liable for these allegations. The freedom to approach the forum authorized for proof was waived, in the request \ r \ n top advocates from Chishtian lawyer