Find a Lawyer

CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. versus PEGASUS CONSULTANCY (PVT.) LTD.

Article 42 and title 54 and title 54 Permanent order declaration of right to hold exhibit The plaintiff company contracted with the authorities to hold a trade show, under its trademark IGATEX authorities, in April 1, 2013, without notice Changed the booking of the claimant's exhibit. And all the dates and places were allocated to IGATEX and converted to megatEX, this was the claimant whose booking trade name for the 2008 exhibition was made by IGATEX officials, therefore, the claimant was entitled to the reservation and the claimant. Could not have had it. In the past years, no exception to the ownership and use of this property in connection with IGATEX by the plaintiff was recognized in the Booking Agreement and under the agreement the authorities acted for the plaintiff on specific dates and It could only be claimed. The plaintiff and another plaintiff were not entitled to organize this program in the name of GIGATX Pakistan in April 2008 2008. AN 2008 2008 \\ plain The reservation made for the plaintiff and the change accepted by the defendant should be retained as the renaming of the MEGATX was nothing more than a change. At least that was not allowed by law, the part paid by the authorities in the dispute was doubtful because as the exhibition manager it did not show its ignorance in the work of the plaintiff, Having already held 5 exhibitions under its name, authorities should not allow suspects to rename megataxes from IGATX Had been The plaintiff should investigate or at least his tax advocates from Kahuta lawyer