Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT ALIAS LIAQUAT versus STATE

In section 302, ??? & un 34 of the Law of Martyrdom (Article 1984 of of), Article evidence40 that the accused / applicants, along with the alleged accomplice, had their male organs cut off with a sharp weapon at midnight. The deceased died as a result of the operation. Subsequently, with the help of the accused, the help of two co-accused, whose name was not included in the charge sheet, allegedly buried the body in an empty plot, the trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302, 201 and 34. Was charged with the crime of giving. Late death of PPC was unnatural. Along with the dead body, the organs of the male organs were recovered. The question is who killed the deceased, this was a case in point. Clearly the crime was not intentional; the deceased volunteered for the operation. It is quite common for a group of eunuchs to carry out such operations and they also specialize in such operations. During the court appearance, the accused / appellant provided all information regarding the culture, residence practices and customs of the transgender. Although the accused had insistently refused to commit the crime, the voluntary court had voluntarily assisted the court in communicating the culture and practice of the guru's practice. The accused had stated that he was not a guru and as he was not involved in recording the operation, he had disclosed that there was no evidence against the present accused. None of the witnesses was involved in the commission of the alleged crime. The piece of evidence used against the accused identifies the commission of the crime and the organs of the deceased and tax advocates from Topi lawyer