Find a Lawyer

SYED KASHIF RAZA versus P.I.A. CORPORATION

Sections 3, 5, 6 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 dismissing the misunderstanding of the petition, dismissed the applicant after issuing a show cause notice and inquiring for theft against him. He was caught red-handed stolen some goods from duty-free shop at the international airport, and the allegation of theft against the applicant was based on a third-party report, which could not be said in part because the applicant had Confirmed the theft by signing the approved shoplifter report in his own autograph. He said that the applicant's entry had included him in the shoplifting, which in all respects meant misconduct employer, was very entitled to take action against the applicant under the circumstances and dismissal of the applicant in this case. As it can be called proportional punishment. A serious form of misconduct and conviction also came to mean that under the preventive laws, the applicant participated in the investigation against the accused with full knowledge of the nature of the allegations and submitted his response that The applicant was given the appropriate opportunity to defend his case, there was no personal hearing, other sensible legal requirements and it depended on the jurisdiction of the dependent. The employer may be called a supplement and may also be ordered, if there is any deficiency left in the inquiry or will require any explanation from the person who has worked against the quantity or the attractiveness of the proceedings. Gravity was not very content. And it was to see whether, under these circumstances, the alleged act of misconduct advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer